Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Strader

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1960No. Appeals, 85, 86, 87 and 88PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Eagen,

While charging the jury in the trial of a civil action, the judge observed one of the jurors taking notes. He interrupted his general trial instructions and admonished the jurors that such a practice was not permitted. The juror immediately desisted. When the charge was completed, and before the jury retired to the jury room to consider and decide the case, another juror approached the bench and notified the trial judge that he, too, had taken notes and immediately handed over to the judge three pages of handwritten memoranda which he had jotted down during the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Friedman v. Ralph Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. KoshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Thornton v. WeaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Cheek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Dillon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Lancaster Redevelopment Authority AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. HokeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API