Legal Opinion · Dissent

Porter v. Stanford

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1959No. 6910Published

1DissentJohnson, Justice

I am unable to agree with the decision of the majority and am firmly of the opinion that the result reached is contrary to the established law in this jurisdiction. First: As I view the majority opinion it is now the law in this state that individual creditors of members of a partnership can have the partnership assets applied in liquidation of their claims before an accounting is had of the partnership and before the creditors of the partnership are satisfied. Second: By virtue of the majority opinion it is now possible under A.R.S. § 25-321, to modify a final judgment without filing a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seiler v. WhitingArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Galiger v. McNultyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Cone v. RighettiArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Burk v. BurkArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Holmes v. HolmesWyoming Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API