Porter v. Stanford
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentJohnson, Justice
I am unable to agree with the decision of the majority and am firmly of the opinion that the result reached is contrary to the established law in this jurisdiction. First: As I view the majority opinion it is now the law in this state that individual creditors of members of a partnership can have the partnership assets applied in liquidation of their claims before an accounting is had of the partnership and before the creditors of the partnership are satisfied. Second: By virtue of the majority opinion it is now possible under A.R.S. § 25-321, to modify a final judgment without filing a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seiler v. WhitingArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Galiger v. McNultyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Cone v. RighettiArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Burk v. BurkArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Holmes v. HolmesWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.