Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re the Union Pacific Railroad

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1943No. 7041PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

The following statement of facts appears in appellant’s brief, over which there seems to be no dispute, to-wit:

“The latter part of August, 1941, the Union Pacific Railroad Company filed with the Public Service Commission of Utah an application for authority to discontinue its trains 553 and 554 between Cache Junction, Utah, and Preston, Idaho, and trains 559 and 560 between Ogden, Utah, and Malad, Idaho.
“Following the filing of this application with the Utah Commission the Idaho Public Utilities Commission having been informed of the application filed in Utah issued its Order No. 1755 on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. People ex rel. Cantrell v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. State Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Marshall v. BushNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Board of Railroad Comm'rs.Montana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. WendlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City of Princeton v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In re Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Morrow v. Wm. Berklund Forest Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API