Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Wm. Berklund Forest Products Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1959No. 8725Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

TAYLOR, Justice.

Respondent’s petition for rehearing urges error in our finding that plaintiff (appellant) is entitled to rescission and cancellation of the option and timber deed. Two principal grounds are advanced to support this contention.

First, that the option and deed may not be rescinded and cancelled because certain of the parties to them are not parties to this litigation. With respect to the option, it is contended the optionee, Spafford, is a necessary party. This contention is without merit. The record is conclusive that he acted solely as the agent of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rea v. ReaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dahl v. Crain Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Schmidt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Gibson v. EnrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API