Legal Opinion
Am. Nat. Red Cross v. Asd Spec. Healthcare
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 19, 2004No. 1020446PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
888 So.2d 464 (2004)
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS
v.
ASD SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE, INC., an incorporated division of Amerisource Bergen Corp. d/b/a Oncology Supply; Midwest Drug Supply, LLC; and Raymar Worldwide Sales, Inc.
1020446.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
October 3, 2003.
Opinion Overruling Rehearing March 19, 2004.
Dennis D. Murrell and Amy E. Shoemaker of Middleton Reutlinger, Louisville, Kentucky; and Benjamin M. Bowden, P.C., Andalusia, for plaintiff.
Sandy G. Robinson and Ian D. Rosenthal of Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O'Neal, Mobile, for respondent ASD Specialty Healthcare, Inc.
2Per curiam 1
The United…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2; Concurrence.
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALA. v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Parker v. HilliardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- May v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Rountree v. Nunnery (In Re Rountree)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Ex Parte Partners in Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Peacock Timber Transport, Inc. v. B.P. Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Holsombeck v. USAmeriBankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Holsombeck v. USAmeriBankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018