Holtmann v. Knott
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilcox, J.
I agree with the majority in this case that the *730circuit court properly concluded that Knott was entitled to summary judgment concerning the custody action commenced under sec. 767.24(3), Stats.
I disagree with the majority, however, as to its conclusion that the ch. 767 visitation statute — sec. 767.245, Stats — does not apply to Holtzman's petition for visitation rights to Knott's biological child. I believe that the legislature intended that circuit courts' powers regarding visitation were to be derived exclusively from sec. 767.245. Further, in reviewing and applying the cases construing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Sporleder v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Laskaris v. City of Wisconsin Dells, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.