Legal Opinion

Milisich v. Hillhouse

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1924No. 2606PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in the action, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. ’ We will allude to the parties as plaintiff and defendant, as they were in the trial court.

The defendant, as sheriff, acting under a writ of attachment, attached a Haynes automobile in an action to recover a money judgment against one Steve B. Milisich, the husband of the plaintiff, of whom we will speak as “Steve.” This action was instituted to recover the possession of the car, upon the theory that it was the separate property of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. FrankeNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Laws v. RossNevada Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trimble v. St. Joseph's HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sayles v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Petition of FullerNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Carlson v. McCallNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Zahringer v. ZahringerNevada Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API