Pacific Creosoting Co. v. Thames & Mersey Marine Ins.
District Court, W.D. Washington
In Admiralty. Suit by the Pacific Creoso-ting Company against the Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance Company, Limited.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
This action is founded on a marine policy insuring a cargo, 2,753 drums of creosote oil in the British ship “Sardhana,” shipped from London, England, to Eagle Harbor in Puget Sound, Wash., “including the risk of craft, and/or raft to and from the vessel.” There is also incorporated in the policy by attaching to the margin a printed slip, which is not a part of the printed form, the following;
“Warranted free from particular average, unless the vessel or craft or the interest insured be stranded, sunk or on fire. * * *
General average and salvage charges payable according…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Steel v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
- Yeaton v. FrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Nome Beach Lighterage & Transportation Co. v. Munich Assur. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.