Legal Opinion

Pacific Creosoting Co. v. Thames & Mersey Marine Ins.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 15, 1914No. 4354Published

In Admiralty. Suit by the Pacific Creoso-ting Company against the Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance Company, Limited.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

This action is founded on a marine policy insuring a cargo, 2,753 drums of creosote oil in the British ship “Sardhana,” shipped from London, England, to Eagle Harbor in Puget Sound, Wash., “including the risk of craft, and/or raft to and from the vessel.” There is also incorporated in the policy by attaching to the margin a printed slip, which is not a part of the printed form, the following;

“Warranted free from particular average, unless the vessel or craft or the interest insured be stranded, sunk or on fire. * * *

General average and salvage charges payable according…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Steel v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
  4. Yeaton v. FrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  5. Nome Beach Lighterage & Transportation Co. v. Munich Assur. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API