Legal Opinion

United States v. Nancy Brown and Michael Kaliterna

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1992No. 90-50487PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

The United States Government appeals from the order granting motions filed by Nancy Brown and Michael Kaliterna to suppress evidence seized from their residences. The district court ruled (1) the warrants authorizing the searches were not supported by probable cause, and (2) the officers who obtained the warrants did not act in good faith.

The Government seeks reversal on the following grounds: (1) the magistrate had substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed for the search of appellees’ residences based on the affidavits offered in support of the search…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Erickson Meko CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Aundre Sterling WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Terrence Wayne ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Leon Angel ValenciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Mendocino Environmental Center v. Mendocino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API