MISENHELTER v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
The Petitioner Paul Misenhelter appeals his sentence of twenty-five years for negligent child abuse, § 18-6-401(1)(a), CRS. (2002). He argues that the trial judge erred by considering Misenhelter's "concurrent" conviction 1 for aggravated incest, § 18-6- 802(1)(a), C.R.S. (2002), during his sentence ing for the child abuse charge. The court of appeals upheld the sentence, holding that consideration of a "concurrent" conviction did not violate the constitutional requirement-described in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and its progeny-that facts must…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. GlasserColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Mountjoy, Jr. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Veith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.