Legal Opinion

MISENHELTER v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 2010No. 09SC183PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

The Petitioner Paul Misenhelter appeals his sentence of twenty-five years for negligent child abuse, § 18-6-401(1)(a), CRS. (2002). He argues that the trial judge erred by considering Misenhelter's "concurrent" conviction 1 for aggravated incest, § 18-6- 802(1)(a), C.R.S. (2002), during his sentence ing for the child abuse charge. The court of appeals upheld the sentence, holding that consideration of a "concurrent" conviction did not violate the constitutional requirement-described in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and its progeny-that facts must…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. GlasserColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  3. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  4. Mountjoy, Jr. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  5. Veith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API