Legal Opinion

People v. Pauli

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1922No. Crim. No. 1047PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The defendant was charged in the information with the crime of making and uttering a forged check with intent to defraud. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment for the term provided by law. His appeal is from the judgment of conviction.

The first contention which the appellant makes upon said appeal is that the trial court committed prejudicial error in granting the motion of the prosecution to strike out the testimony of two certain character witnesses who had testified to the good reputation of the defendant for truth, honesty, integrity, and veracity. The record touching…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. StennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. Dean.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. People v. KeeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. DyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. GiguiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API