Legal Opinion

State v. Barfell

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 10, 2010No. 2009AP1568-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

¶ 1. The circuit court erred while sentencing Thomas H.L. Barfell when it failed to consider the sentencing guidelines for burglary that were then in effect. Barfell appeals the court's mistake and is seeking a resentencing at which the court must consider the sentencing guidelines. However, the statute requiring the circuit court to consider sentence guidelines was repealed after Barfell's sentencing. We affirm because Barfell is not entitled to relief under any of the theories he has propounded.

¶ 2. In 2008, Barfell was facing two counts of burglary when he entered into a plea agreement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trinity Petroleum, Inc. v. Scott Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Whalen v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. State v. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Implementation of Felony Sentencing GuidelinesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HainesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  2. State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API