Forsberg v. Zehm
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Crump, P.,
after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court.
The plaintiffs in error complain of the rulings of the trial court in overruling their demurrer to the notice of motion, in excluding certain evidence offered by them, in admitting evidence offered by the plaintiff, in refusing their instructions and granting others, and in denying a motion to set aside the verdict.
The contentions upon which these assignments of error are based, and which the defendants endeavor to support in their argument here, are that Zehm contracted, through the music committee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carpenter & Co. v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Lunsford & Withrow & Co. v. WrenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Fechteler v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Globe Furniture Co. v. Trustees of Jerusalem Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Sun Co. v. BurrussSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cain v. ReaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Catlett v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Hawthorne v. Austin Organ Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Henry Pilcher's Sons, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Harvest Christian Center v. Zoning Appeals BoardKing George County Circuit Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.