Legal Opinion
Richmond Petroleum, Inc. v. Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 1995No. 94CA0593PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
On January 14, 1994, plaintiff, Richmond Petroleum, Inc. (Richmond), filed a complaint pursuant to provisions of the State Administrative Procedure Act (APA), § 24-4-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1988 Repl.Vol. 10A), seeking judicial review of an order of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (com mission). The trial court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that the complaint was filed one day late. Richmond appeals from this judgment, contending primarily that the court erred in calculating the commencement of the 30-day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division v. BorquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- R.E.N. v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. San EmerterioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Bethesda Foundation of Nebraska v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Flores v. Colorado Department of Revenue, State, Tax DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Denny Construction, Inc. v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Weld Air & Water v. Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Parrish v. Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health & the EnvironmentColorado Court of Appeals · 1997