Legal Opinion

R.E.N. v. City of Colorado Springs

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 13, 1992No. 90SC659, 90SC670 and 90SC693PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack

This is a consolidated appeal by three juveniles, R.E.N., S.D.W., and C.B.H., from district court rulings that the municipal court of Colorado Springs is not required to afford a juvenile the procedures in the Colorado Children’s Code, 1 Title 19, §§ 19-1- 101 to 19-11-110, 8B C.R.S. (1991 Supp.), when a juvenile is prosecuted for violating a municipal ordinance, the penalty for which may not be a jail sentence. We affirm the district court rulings.

I

R.E.N. and S.D.W.

On September 30, 1989, S.D.W. was charged in Colorado Springs Municipal Court with shoplifting in violation of section 21-6-401…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Walgreen Co. v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife v. William P. Clark, as Secretary of the Interior and the Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. People v. SneedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. B.B. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. SwainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Martinez v. BadisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Bill Boom Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API