Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cole v. Cates

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1966No. 41795Published

1Dissent

Felton, Chief Judge, Nichols, Presiding Judge, Jordan and Frankum, Judges,

dissenting. We think that the court erred in *546sustaining the plaintiff’s oral motion to strike the various paragraphs of the defendant’s answer. Code § 37-707 provides: “Any relations shall be deemed confidential, arising from nature or created by law, or resulting from contracts, where one party is so situated as to exercise a controlling influence over the will, conduct, and interest of another; or where, from similar relation of mutual confidence, the law requires the utmost good faith; such as partners, principal and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. FoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Dover v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Jekshewitz v. GroswaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Pirkle v. GurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API