Legal Opinion

Emanuel Pea, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 19, 1968No. 20433Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing En Banc

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and DANAHER, BURGER, WRIGHT, Mc-

GOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc.

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

On December 20, 1967, a division of this court found error in the District Court’s determination (made at 1966 Jackson v. Denno1 hearing held pursuant to the Supreme Court’s mandate),2 that appellant’s confession was voluntary. The division went on to rule that “it cannot fairly be found beyond a reasonable doubt that the confession was voluntary * * * [and] if that is the appropriate standard * * * a new trial must be…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API