Legal Opinion

HENRY VANN COMPANY, INC. v. Barefoot

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1958No. 182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The only evidence was that offered by plaintiff. All the evidence was to the effect that the transaction of February 23, 1955, was an even trade in which each vehicle was valued at $2,033.00.

In charging the jury, the court gave peremptory instructions in plaintiff’s favor on the first and third issues. As to the fourth issue, the instruction was as follows: “Now, if you have answered either one of the first three issues no, then you would answer the fourth issue ‘nothing;’ but if you have answered all of the first three issues yes, and come ,to consider the fourth issue, then if you believe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coulbourn v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Hendrix v. B & L Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Hodges v. . Wilkinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Martin v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API