Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. CASCADE EMPLOYER'S ASS'N, INC., OF PACIFIC NW
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 2, 1963No. Civ. A. 3429-62, 3447-62PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.
Similar motions in the two above-entitled cases raise important questions concerning where the Government must bring a civil suit seeking compliance with certain filing provisions of Title II of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, Pub.L. 86-257, 73 Stat. 519 et seq. (1959), 29 U.S.C. §§ 401-531 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Plaintiff is the Secretary of Labor. Defendant Cascade is an Oregon corporation having its registered office in Oregon; defendant Harvey Aluminum is a California corporation having its principal place of business in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Travis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Johnston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- District of Columbia v. Jerry M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- United States v. Pascal DijamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Lodge No. 42 of the International Brotherhood of Boiler-Makers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Lodge No. 42 of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.