State v. Pless
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentSears, Chief Justice
Because the majority errs by concluding that OCGA § 42-8-35 authorizes a trial court to order a defendant who has previously been found to be indigent to reimburse the government for the attorney fees arising from his defense, I dissent to the majority opinion.
The introductory clause of OCGA § 42-8-35 provides that a trial court “shall determine the terms and conditions of probation and may *62provide” that a probationer comply with any of 13 conditions of probation. Of those thirteen specific conditions, three are monetary conditions of probation that a trial court may impose.4 Those three…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- State v. CollettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Erwin EYLER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MerricCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.