Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Pless

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 4, 2007No. S06G1832Published

1DissentSears, Chief Justice

Because the majority errs by concluding that OCGA § 42-8-35 authorizes a trial court to order a defendant who has previously been found to be indigent to reimburse the government for the attorney fees arising from his defense, I dissent to the majority opinion.

The introductory clause of OCGA § 42-8-35 provides that a trial court “shall determine the terms and conditions of probation and may *62provide” that a probationer comply with any of 13 conditions of probation. Of those thirteen specific conditions, three are monetary conditions of probation that a trial court may impose.4 Those three…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. State v. CollettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Erwin EYLER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. MerricCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API