Wittkowsky v. Baruch.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PjctitioN to re-bear.
1Opinion of the CourtEurohtss, J.
Tbis case was before ns at tbe last term, and is reported in 126 N. C., 747, and is before us again upon a petition to re-bear. Tbe facts are fully stated in tbe report of tbe case when bere before, and we will not re-state them, further than we may find it necessary to do so to dispose of tbe petition to re-hear. When tbe case was bere before, we were of tbe opinion that tbe plaintiff could not recover upon the old notes, and so stated in tbe opinion; and, while the defendants seem to understand tbis to have been tbe decision of tbe Court, the plaintiff does not so understand tbe opinion.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Phalen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- King v. . WinantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Kerr v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Cansler v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Covington v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Cansler v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- DeLoache v. DeLoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Aydlett v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Davis Sulphur Ore Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.