Legal Opinion

Wittkowsky v. Baruch.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PjctitioN to re-bear.

1Opinion of the CourtEurohtss, J.

Tbis case was before ns at tbe last term, and is reported in 126 N. C., 747, and is before us again upon a petition to re-bear. Tbe facts are fully stated in tbe report of tbe case when bere before, and we will not re-state them, further than we may find it necessary to do so to dispose of tbe petition to re-hear. When tbe case was bere before, we were of tbe opinion that tbe plaintiff could not recover upon the old notes, and so stated in tbe opinion; and, while the defendants seem to understand tbis to have been tbe decision of tbe Court, the plaintiff does not so understand tbe opinion.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Phalen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
  2. King v. . WinantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. Kerr v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Cansler v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Covington v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Cansler v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. DeLoache v. DeLoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Aydlett v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Davis Sulphur Ore Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API