Legal Opinion

(SS) Abelia v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 18, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01224Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAY WILLIAM ABELIA, No. 2:23-cv-01224 AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”), discontinuing plaintiff’s disability benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the 20 Social Security Act (“the Act”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34,1 pursuant to 223(f) of the Social 21 Security Act. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be 22…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API