Legal Opinion

State v. Odom

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1973No. 7320SC423Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK,- Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence witness Cole’s in-court identification of him as the perpetrator of the robbery.

Before allowing Mrs. Cole’s in-court identification of defendant as the person who committed the robbery, the trial judge conducted a voir dire examination in the absence of the jury; and, after hearing testimony of Mrs. Cole, defendant, Deputy Sheriff Joe Warner of Richmond County, and Jesse Goodwin, Jailer of Richmond County, the court made findings and conclusions “[t]hat the identification or show-up of the defendant in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McVaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. SneedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API