Legal Opinion

State v. Sneed

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1972No. 722SC217PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant first contends the trial court erred in admitting hearsay evidence in the trial of the case. An examination of the exception upon which this assignment of error is based reveals that the testimony complained of occurred on voir dire hearing to determine the admissibility of the in-court identification of the defendant. In a hearing before a judge without a jury the ordinary rules as to the competency of evidence which are applicable in a jury trial are to some extent relaxed, but if incompetent evidence is submitted, the presumption arises that it was disregarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. McVaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ayden Tractors, Inc. v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. PhiferCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. OdomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API