Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 2012No. A12-1139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In June 2012, petitioner Rae Anderson filed an affidavit of candidacy and nominating petition with the Secretary of State’s Office, seeking to run as an independent candidate for Minnesota State Representative, House District 30B. The Secretary of State notified Anderson that her nominating petition had been rejected because it did not bear her residence address, as required by Minn.Stat. § 204B.07, subd. 1(b) (2010), and because Anderson’s statement of political party or political principle exceeded the three-word limit imposed by Minn.Stat. § 204B.07, subd. 1(c) (2010). On July 3,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Schiff v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Paquin v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Idusogie v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steve Carlson v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, Minnesota State LegislatureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API