Legal Opinion
Larson v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 2009No. A09-495PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
In this appeal from summary judgment, appellant argues that the district court erred in failing to discharge part of a condemnation easement under Minn.Stat. § 117.225 on the ground that the easement was no longer being used for highway purposes. Because Minn.Stat. § 117.225 does not permit discharge of a portion of an easement, we affirm.
FACTS
In 1956, respondent State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (the state) began acquiring land easements to build what is now trunk highway 29 in respondent Douglas County (the county). In 1966, a deed describing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Tracy State Bank v. Tracy-Garvin CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009