Legal Opinion

R. M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 6, 1982No. 81-2248PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASKIN, Judge.

We reverse the order adjudging defendant R. M. delinquent. Defendant’s conviction of grand theft was not supported by the evidence; the state failed to prove that R. M. knew the bicycle had been stolen. State v. Lewis, 364 So.2d 1223 (Fla.1978); State v. Allen, 362 So.2d 10 (Fla.1978); Fisk v. State, 138 Fla. 815, 190 So. 10 (1939); R.A.L. v. State, 402 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); A.R. v. State, 393 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Defendant’s unrefuted explanation that he borrowed the bicycle from a friend precluded conviction under section 812.014, Florida Statutes (1979).

Reve…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. R. A. L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. A. R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Fisk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. E.L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. R.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. R.D.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Bertone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API