Legal Opinion

R.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 22, 1984No. 83-1069PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASKIN, Judge.

We reverse the order adjudicating R.M. delinquent based upon our finding that the conviction for grand theft was not supported by the evidence. The state failed to demonstrate that R.M. had either the requisite intent to steal the automobile or knowledge that the vehicle he was driving was stolen. State v. Lewis, 364 So.2d 1223 (Fla.1978); State v. Allen, 362 So.2d 10 (Fla.1978); R.M. v. State, 412 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). R.M.’s “unrefuted, exculpatory and not unreasonable explanation of his possession” of the stolen automobile— that he borrowed it from his stepfather—…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. R. A. L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. A. R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Fisk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. E.L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Bertone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. B.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API