Legal Opinion

Branscombe v. Jenks

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 4, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, a minor, through his friend, claimed that he was unintentionally omitted from his grandfather’s will, and brought a petition in the Probate Court to establish his intestate share of the estate under the provisions of G. L. c. 191, § 20. That statute, as amended by St. 1969, c. 479, § 2, provides in pertinent part that "[i]f a testator omits to provide in his will for any of his children, whether born before or after the testator’s death, or for the issue of a deceased child, they shall take the same share of his estate which they would have taken if he had died intestate ...…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanguinetti v. Nantucket Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  2. Woodvine v. DeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Ryan v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Wilder v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API