Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert SCHWARTZ, Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 17, 1972No. 456, Docket 71-1871PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARIE, District Judge:

The appellant was convicted after a trial by the court of having conspired to violate § 8(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 7811(c), 1 and Rule 17 C.F.R. § 240.8e-l, which prohibit the unlawful hypothecation of securities by brokers or dealers, who transact a business through a national exchange. The trial court found that appellant had unlawfully caused Armstrong & Co., Inc., a broker-dealer, to hypothecate securities “carried for the account of” its customers, so that said securities were subjected to a lien in excess of the aggregate…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lloyd DIXON, Jr., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. BrashierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. United States v. Perry BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Jose JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API