Legal Opinion

Keister v. Bell

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 19, 2020No. 7:17-cv-00131Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION RODNEY KEISTER, } } Plaintiff, } } v. } Case No.: 7:17-cv-00131-RDP } STUART BELL, et al., } } Defendants. } MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is before the court on the parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment. (Docs. # 59, 60). The motions are fully briefed. After careful consideration, and for the reasons explained below, the court finds that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 59) is due to be granted, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 60) is due to denied. I. Background1 The…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API