Legal Opinion
Claim of Bromley v. Rich Aluminum & Vinyl Siding, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mercure, J.P.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 12, 2004, which denied claimant’s application for reconsideration and/or full Board review of a prior decision ruling that claimant did not suffer an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.
Claimant was employed as a sales manager for a vinyl siding company when, on July 5, 2001, he allegedly injured his left knee while inspecting a customer’s leaking roof. As is relevant here, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge ruled that claimant did not suffer a compensable injury, citing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Graham v. Pathways, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Castro v. Tishman Speyer PropertiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rambally v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kozak v. Suny at Old WestburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Adamo v. Richard Spoering, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Ford v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Marks v. Evergreen Country ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Nikolaeva v. Cattaraugus County Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Earnest v. J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Ford v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005