Legal Opinion
Claim of Castro v. Tishman Speyer Properties
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Lahtinen, J.
Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 22, 2001, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a further causally related disability, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed July 2, 2002, which denied claimant’s application for full Board review and/or reconsideration.
Claimant, a maintenance worker, was injured at her job on December 29, 1997 when she slipped and fell on a wet floor. She filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits and, following hearings before a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ), her case was established…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Van Patten v. Quandt's Wholesale DistributorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of Marshall v. Murnane AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Dennis v. County Limousine Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Sanders v. Nyack HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- Claim of Mayette v. Village of Massena Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Satalino v. Dan's Supreme SupermarketAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Claim of Wilson v. Southern Tier Custom FabricatorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Guz v. Jewelers Machinist, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Albert v. Miracle Makers of Bedford Stuyvesant HFDC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.