Legal Opinion

Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co. v. Brockenbrough

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

There is only one question involved in this appeal — ■ the validity of .chapter 70, Public Laws 1923. This act is in substance as follows: It provides that where an executor under a will, for the purpose of securing assets with which to pay off valid indebtedness, in good faith, and under the mistaken belief that the will authorized him to do so, sells real estate of said estate for a fair price and applies the proceeds of such sale to the payment of such indebtedness, and these facts are established in an action to remove cloud from title brought by the purchaser or his grantor, in which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Pendleton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Brown v. Town of HillsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Dawson v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Edwards v. Nash County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Brown v. . HillsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API