Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Hoboken White Lead & Color Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 20, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission, acting under the authority of section 5 of the Act of Congress approved September 26, 1914, 38 Stat. 717, 719 (15 USCA § 45), on June 19, 1929, served upon the respondent its order to cease and desist in a proceeding before the Commission entitled “In the Matter of Hoboken WThite Lead & Color Works, Inc., Docket No. 1565.” This proceeding was based upon a complaint, issued February 19; 1929, pursuant to the statute, which charged the respondent with the practice of misbranding and misrepresenting its paint materials and paint pigments, sold…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wagner v. City of CovingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hughes Brothers Timber Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Federal Trade Commission v. A. McLean & SonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Holland Furnace Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- United States v. CowanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974
- United States v. Eddy Wilmer Vail-BailonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.