Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Steiniger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1922No. Gen. No. 6,981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

On the 1st day of October, 1919, William C. Turs, appellee’s intestate, entered into a written agreement for the sale to Marsh of premises known as 261 Gi-rove Avenue, Elgin, Illinois, consisting of a dwelling house and lot. At the time of the sale the title to the prem-. ises was in the heirs at law of Dora Turs, deceased. As one of said heirs, Turs owned one-eighth interest in the premises. The contract styles him as William C. Turs, administrator of the estate of Dora Turs, deceased. He signed the instrument “William C. Turs, ‘Adrar.’ Dora Turs.” Marsh paid $500 down on the contract. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. DeProft v. HeydeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hale v. CravenerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bauerle v. LongIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Coutsogeorge v. MonaghanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanni, Inc. v. FiocchiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Thomas v. GouwensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Weiland v. WeilandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  4. Sanni, Inc. v. FiocchiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API