Rachel v. Pearsall
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the court of the seventh district.
1Opinion of the CourtDerbigny, J.
The question in this case is simply whether a written lease of immoveable property shall prevail over a verbal one of anterior date, accompanied with possession.
Paul Pearsall the defendant, occupies a tract of land belonging to J. B. Rachel, leased to him by verbal contract. While he was in possession under this lease, J. B. Rachel entered into a contract of lease, in writing, with Hilaire Rachel for the same land. On Pearsall’s refusal to surrender the land to this new lessee, the present action was brought.
*703West'n District. September, 1820.
The plaintiff contends that leases of landed…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Kittridge v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842