Legal Opinion
Reliance Insurance Co. v. Kronzer, Abraham & Watkins
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 17, 1979No. 17381PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Chief Justice.
The Reliance Insurance Company intervened in a lawsuit seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries to recover the amount of the worker’s compensation benefits it had paid to the plaintiff as authorized by Article 8307, Section 6a, Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated. The damage suit was settled for a sum greatly in excess of the total amount of compensation and medical benefits paid by Reliance, and the judgment awarded Reliance the sum of $33,-162.53 less 25% thereof which was awarded to Kronzer, Abraham & Watkins, as attorneys’ fees. The Reliance Insurance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fort Worth Lloyds v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Texas Employers Insurance v. BrandonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Campbell v. Sonford Chemical CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Warneke v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Simpson v. Texas Employers Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shelak v. White Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Latter v. AutryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Allen & Coon Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- John Shelak v. White Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Richard Latter v. Sandra A. Autry, Receiver of American Pacer Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.