Legal Opinion

Naquin v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 2012No. 2011 CW 1217PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuidry, J.

[ gPlaintiffs-lessors, Lorise M. and Lucy Nguyen Naquin and Grantly, LLC (collectively the Naquins), appeal that portion of the trial court’s judgment that sustained a peremptory exception raising the objection of prescription and dismissed their claims for damages ex delicto arising out of five of six leases they have with defendant, Bol-linger Shipyards, Inc. (Bollinger). Bol-linger appeals that portion of the trial court’s judgment that overruled its dilatory exception raising the objection of prematurity. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s ruling on the exception of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. Williamson v. HOSPITAL SERVICE OF JEFFERSONSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. Gallant Investments, Ltd. v. Illinois Central RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Naquin v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Robertson v. Sun Life FinancialLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Hernandez v. Asap Emp't Serv., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Hernandez v. Asap Emp't Serv., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal District v. Reynolds Metal CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API