Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Darrin Lewis, Sr. v. Ascension Parish School Board

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 3, 2011No. 09-30971Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKing, Circuit Judge

In reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment, the majority creates a fact issue where none exists. Plaintiff Darrin Kenny Lewis’s only claim on appeal is that the Ascension Parish School Board allocated a disproportionately large number of at-risk students to East Ascension High School and its feeder schools, which adversely impacted the education of minority children at those predominately minority schools. Lewis, however, failed to present any evidence that the Board intended to discriminate against minority students by placing too many at-risk students in their schools.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API