Rachelle S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Raehelle S. and Mark B., the biological parents of Marcus S., appeal from the juvenile court’s order adjudicating Marcus to be dependent. The issue on appeal is whether the court’s finding of likely, serious emotional or physical harm to the child is supported by expert testimony as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 United States Code (“U.S.C.”) 1901 et seq. (1994) (“the Act”). Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Marcus was born on September 21, 1996. During the first few months of his life, various family members provided care for him. On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25525Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-903.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- In Re Interest of CWNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of Baby Boy DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- L.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Steven H. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- In The Interest of M.F.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Brenda O. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- In the Matter of the Guardianship of LNP, a Minor Child: KC v. CC and ECWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.