Legal Opinion

Winston v. Gibbs

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1990No. A045376PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, J.

The law of California allows a will to be refused admission to probate if it is the product of undue influence exercised by a *603beneficiary under the will. A person contesting a will on this ground is aided by a presumption of undue influence if the contestant produces evidence that the beneficiary (1) had a confidential relationship with the decedent (2) was active in procuring the will and (3) “unduly” profited from it. The issue presented on this appeal by a losing contestant is whether the probate court erred in not instructing the jury that the concept of undue profit has a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Estate of FritschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of SarabiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API