Legal Opinion

City of De Kalb v. Thomas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 2002No. Nos. 2—00—1011, 2—00—1034 through 2—00—1053 consPublished

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

In each of the cases consolidated here on appeal, plaintiff, the City of De Kalb, appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering De Kalb to pay the fees of defense counsel appointed by the court. We reverse.

De Kalb is a home rule municipality pursuant to article VII, section 6(a), of the Illinois Constitution. Ill. Const. 1970, art. VII, § 6(a). As such, it has the authority to regulate public safety. See Ill. Const. 1970, art. VII, § 6(a). De Kalb has passed various ordinances regarding disorderly conduct, battery, criminal damage to property, and retail theft. See City of De Kalb…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Chicago v. Fair Employment Practices CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. R.W. Dunteman Co. v. C/G Enterprises Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People Ex Rel. Conn v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. The PEOPLE v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API