Hill v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
On February 7, 2001, this court denied Motiva’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Motiva has now filed a motion for reconsideration. As explained below, Motiva’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
In our prior order we held that it would be appropriate to retain personal jurisdiction over Motiva based on a joint venture theory. The joint venture theory provides that the minimum contacts of one co-venturer are attributable to other coventurers such that personal jurisdiction over one means personal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re: Gaston & Snow, Debtor, Alfred J. Bianco, as Plan Administrator to the Estate of Gaston & Snow v. Robert A. Erkins & Bernadine ErkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Foster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Coastal Plains Development Corp. v. Micrea, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Khan v. Gramercy Advisors, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- AAA Max 1 Limited v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- BT Prime Ltd. v. Bos. Techs. Powered By Forexware LLC (In re BT Prime Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Barnett v. Vapor Maven OK 1, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.