Legal Opinion
Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 21, 2001No. CIV.A.01-10099-WGYPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, a local law professor, brought suit against two sets of defendants, one from Mississippi and the other from South Carolina. The suit has occasioned three hearings before the Court. At the first hearing, the Court held that the plaintiff failed to show why the Mississippi defendants should be subject to personal jurisdiction in Massachusetts. The Court did, however, allow the plaintiff jurisdictional discovery, which led to a second hearing on the matter of personal jurisdiction. At that hearing, the Court dismissed the Mississippi defendants for…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Siaca v. DCC Operating, Inc. (In Re Olympic Mills Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2005
- Blacksmith Investments, LLC. v. Cives Steel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Downing v. Globe Direct LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.