Legal Opinion

In re Berri

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 7, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles H. Kelby, Referee.

This proceeding to remove a trustee is brought under section 99, subdivision 2, of the Surrogate’s Court Wet. This section provides as follows:

“ § 99. Removal, or revocation of letters for disqualification or misconduct. In either of the following cases, a creditor or person interested in the estate of a decedent, or a ward or a friend of a ward, or a person beneficially interested in the execution of a trust, or any surety on a bond of a person to whom letters have been granted or of a trustee may present to the surrogate’s court having jurisdiction a petition,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lent v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Pyle v. PyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Pyle v. . PyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. In re the Estate of HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In re the Estate of StulmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of IsraelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  4. In re the Estate of GerbereuxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of ShermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API