Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Everett

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Broome county. Action for injunction by Frank B. Reynolds and others against James F. Everett and others. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

HARDIN,. P. J.

1. Plaintiffs brought this suit in August, 1890. They were then engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling cigars in the city of Binghamton, and there were other manufacturers engaged in a similar business, and, with the plaintiffs, employ some 3,000 persons to dp the mechanical work of making cigars. The plaintiffs" employ about 400 persons, male and female, in the prosecution of their business; and the complaint alleges that, in order to have the business profitably conducted, it must be “run continuously, and the' stoppage of the business of manufacturing…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Mayor of Hudson v. ThorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  4. Savage v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Brandreth v. LanceNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. ZimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mills v. United States Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Jesse L. Laskey Feature Play Co. v. William Fox Vaudeville Co.New York Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People ex rel. Spire v. General Committee of Republican PartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API