Legal Opinion
The D.L. Auld Company v. Chroma Graphics Corp., and the United States, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 28, 1985No. Appeal 84-1381PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, entered by a United States magistrate, denying the appellant’s motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from a judgment granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee. The Rule 60(b) motion contended that the provisions of the Federal Magistrates Act of 1979 authorizing a magistrate, when designated to do so by the district court he serves and with the consent of the parties, to conduct all proceedings in any civil case, 28…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff- Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- The D.L. Auld Company v. Chroma Graphics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Edna Goldstein v. Robert E. Kelleher, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Howard v. Collins, and United States of America, Intervenor v. William Foreman, Vincent Pilleters and Terry WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Technical Automation Services Corp. v. Liberty Surplus InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Cecil O. Adams v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Nanodata Computer Corp. v. Kollmorgen Corp. (In Re Nanodata Computer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.