People v. Finkle
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
Defendant, James C. Finkle, appeals from an order denying the relief sought in an application showing recovery filed by him pursuant to section 9 of the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 105—9). Defendant contends that he was denied due process of law when the trial court refused to appoint an independent psychiatrist to examine him. The State argues that no such right exists under section 9.
Defendant was found to be a sexually dangerous person under the Act in 1985 and was committed to the Menard Psychiatric Center, a maximum-security institution…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. TrainorIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. McVeayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- People v. TrainorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- People v. SavageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.