Legal Opinion

People v. Burns

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2004No. 95987PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

At issue in this case is whether a respondent filing an application for recovery under the Sexually Dangerous Fersons Act (the SDEA) (725 ILCS 205/0.01 et seq. (West 2000)), is entitled to an independent psychiatric examination. The appellate court reversed the La Salle County circuit court’s order denying respondent’s motion for an independent psychiatric exam, holding that a respondent in a recovery proceeding has a due process right to such an exam. 337 Ill. App. 3d 224. We allowed the State’s petition for leave to appeal from the appellate court’s decision. 177 Ill. 2d R. 315(a).

BACKGROUND

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Poeple v. Robert S.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. LawtonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. RamseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. HaleIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. MastersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API